|
|
Helmet
Laws in Massachusetts
|
|
MANDATORY
MOTORCYCLE HELMET LAW IN
MASSACHUSETTS |
STATUTE:
Title
XIV. Public Ways and Works
Chapter 90. Motor Vehicles
and Aircraft. Section 7.
Brakes, braking systems,
mufflers, horns, lights,
audible warning systems, and
other equipment; compliance
with safety standards;
stickers and emblems. :
"Every
person operating a
motorcycle or riding as a
passenger on a motorcycle
or in a sidecar attached
to a motorcycle shall wear
protective head gear
conforming with such
minimum standards of
construction and
performance as the
registrar may prescribe,
and no person operating a
motorcycle shall permit
any other person to ride
as a passenger on such
motorcycle or in a sidecar
attached to such
motorcycle unless such
passenger is wearing such protective
head gear,. . ."
FINE:
Fine
for 1st offense is $35, with
a "step" increase
on driving records resulting
in an insurance surcharge
for 6 or 7 years. Second
offense is $75 to $100, with
another "step"
increase as above. Plus
potential costs for towing
bike from scene.
STANDARDS:
Title
XIV. Public Ways and Works
Chapter 90. Motor Vehicles
and Aircraft. Section 7.
Brakes, braking systems,
mufflers, horns, lights,
audible warning systems, and
other equipment; compliance
with safety standards;
stickers and emblems. :
"
. . . conforming with such
minimum standards of
construction and
performance as the
registrar may prescribe, .
. ."
COURT
DECISIONS:
"Provision
of this section requiring
motorcyclists to wear
protective headgear is not
violative of due process,
notwithstanding claim that
police power does not extend
to overcoming right of an
individual to incur risks
that involve only himself,
since public has an interest
in minimizing resources
directly involved, in that
from moment of injury,
society picks the person up
off the highway, delivers
him to a municipal hospital
and municipal doctors,
provides him with
unemployment compensation
if, after recovery, he
cannot replace his lost job,
and, if injury causes
permanent disability,
assumes responsibility for
his and his family's
continued subsistence."
Simon v. Sergeant,
D.C.Mass.1972, 346 F.Supp.
277, affirmed 93 S.Ct. 463,
409 U.S. 1020, 34 L.Ed.2d
312.
"Provision
of this section requiring
motorcyclists to wear
protective headgear does not
deny equal protection, in
that rational basis exists
for legislature's
distinction between
motorcyclists and, for
example, automobile drivers,
whose vehicle affords them
substantially more
protection than does a
motorcycle." Simon
v. Sergeant,
D.C.Mass.1972, 346 F.Supp.
277, affirmed 93 S.Ct. 463,
409 U.S. 1020, 34 L.Ed.2d
312.
"In
enacting provision of this
section requiring
motorcyclists to wear
protective headgear, it was
not unreasonable for the
Legislature to link
protective headgear to safer
motorcycling." Simon
v. Sergeant,
D.C.Mass.1972, 346 F.Supp.
277, affirmed 93 S.Ct. 463,
409 U.S. 1020, 34 L.Ed.2d
312.
"Requirement
of this section of
protective headgear for a
motorcyclist but not for a
rider of a "motorized
bicycle * * * which is
capable of a maximum design
speed of no more than
twenty-five miles per
hour" was not a
classification unjustified
by any conceivable set of
facts or findings such as
would violate equal
protection." Com. v.
Guest (1981) 425 N.E.2d
779, 12 Mass.App.Ct. 941.
"This
section and implementing
regulation requiring
motorcyclists to wear
protective headgear did not
conflict with nor were
preempted by 15 U.S.C.A. s
1392 which merely set
standards for helmets
designed for use by
motorcyclists." Com.
v. Guest (1981) 425
N.E.2d 779, 12 Mass.App.Ct.
941.
"This
section, which requires
operator of motorcycle to
wear protective headgear
does not result in an
unconstitutional denial of
the right of privacy." Com.
v. Cowan (1976) 344
N.E.2d 419, 4 Mass.App.Ct.
796.
"Although
issue of right of privacy
was not explicitly mentioned
in Supreme Judicial Court's
decision upholding, as
against constitutional
challenges, this section
requiring that operator of
motorcycle wear protective
headgear, where the
defendant in the prior case
raised the issue by brief
and quoted from relevant
United States Supreme Court
decisions, Appeals Court
would treat the Supreme
Judicial Court's decision as
authoritative on the right
to privacy issue." Com.
v. Cowan (1976) 344
N.E.2d 419, 4 Mass.App.Ct.
796.
"This
section requiring
motorcyclist to wear
protective headgear
conforming with certain
minimum standards bears real
and substantial relation to
public health and general
welfare and is a valid
exercise of police
power." Com. v.
Howie (1968) 238 N.E.2d
373, 354 Mass. 769,
certiorari denied 89 S.Ct.
485, 393 U.S. 999, 21
L.Ed.2d 464.
See
Simon v. Sergeant
above.
"It
lies within power of
Legislature to adopt
reasonable measures for
promotion of safety upon
public ways in interests of
motorcyclists and others who
may use them." Com.
v. Howie (1968) 238
N.E.2d 373, 354 Mass. 769,
certiorari denied 89 S.Ct.
485, 393 U.S. 999, 21
L.Ed.2d 464.
None
of these decisions, or any
other we can find, say that
motorcyclists don't have a
right to know, with
certainty, what
"protective
headgear" is, if the
law is going to them to
"wear protective
headgear".
CURRENT
ACTIVITY:
HB
206
- 1/20/04 - HB 206 - passed
the Senate and goes to the
Governor who has 10 days to
sign. HB 206 gives Freedom
of Choice for riders 18
years or older riding in
publicly permitted parades.
If he veto's the bill, it
goes back to the House where
2/3's of the 160 members
must vote to over-ride his
veto. If accomplished,
then the same is needed in
the Senate.
The Governor's reps advised
he would not take a public
position on 206 until it
reached his desk. If you
ride in MA now is the time
to contact the Governor's
Office. For more info and
how to get involved, where
to write, what to write
visit the Massachusetts
MMA
website.
Insurance
Lawsuit -
12/12/03 - MMA to sue the
state of MA over unfair
insurance practices that
withhold discounts given to
car and truck owners.
Helmet
Regulations in Conflict
- 11/26/03 - Per Paul Cote,
regarding their appeal, the
Court concluded the MA
Regulation for motorcycle
helmets IS IN CONFLICT with
the Federal Standards and
the MMA had authority to
bring the lawsuit on behalf
of its members.
Sept
5 - 7, 2003
- Freedom Ride from MA to PA
to celebrate PA's Adult
Freedom of Choice WIN and to
promote awareness for
Freedom of Choice for ALL
riders in MA, CT, NY and NJ.
July
31, 2003
- ABATE of MA merges into
MMA effective 12/31/03; MMA
to Support PAC!
HB
206 allows
motor cyclists participating
in public parades to be
exempt from the helmet law.
HB
207
regulates the wearing of
helmets for passengers and
operators of motorcycles.
HB
208
regulates the use of
protective headgear for
persons riding on
motorcycles.
RECENT
ACTIVITY:
April
22, 2002 - SB1266 - placed
with the Senate Way &
Means Committee. They intend
to 'study' the 'burden to
society' caused by
helmet-less riders.
Specifically, the increased
insurance and medical costs
they believe will be
incurred. A helmet mod
bill has not progressed this
far in 20 years!
April
2, 2002
- SB1266 - the Joint
Committee for Public Safety
voted a favorable
"Ought to Pass"
recommendation for SB 1266!
-
Helmet confiscation and Bike
towing no longer allowed per
MA State Police memo
Jan
3, 2001 SB-1266
- a 21 Helmet Mod Bill.
Referred to Public Safety
committee. Bill
Updater.
Jan
3, 2001 SB-1267
- a bill prohibiting
ticketing for helmets that
may not be in conformity
with FMV218 except with
proof the operator has
actual knowledge of a
determination of
non-conformity. Referred to
Public Safety committee. Bill
Updater.
Jan
3, 2001 HB-1263
Rep Christine Canavan.
Petition filed at the
request of Brian Chapman
relative to the motorcycle
helmet law. 01/03/01
Referred to the committee on
Public Safety. 01/03/01 S
Senate concurred Public
Hearing date Mar 29. Bill
Updater.
WEBSITES:
|
|
|
| HAVE YOUR
BANNER ON 100'S OF BIKER WEBSITES CLICK
HERE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|